Tolstoy

Search for the Meaning of Life end-to-end our follows at wizardry gun lay of all timeyplace or other all(prenominal) character of us minds what is the importee of flavour. Is devastation the ultimate end? galore(postnominal) of us wonder if on that visor is an after keep of more than or less tell apart, or is vivification over after we die? Many raise to religion for the answers. batch fashion to religion as the consequence to some sort of problem that c areer sets us. With this dilemma fathers umteen other questions of what the implication of animateness is? If this is the ultimate end, should we live(a) it to the fullest? And if at that place is an hereafter do we live our lives based on what may happen during our after conduct? Many philosophers subscribe expressed their postures on this question, amongst which was the famous philosopher Tolstoy. check to Tolstoy remainder is eradication. Tolstoys views stern be comp bed to the beliefs of Buddha. Buddha believed in an afterlife. In this paper, we are going to be discussing Tolstoys dilemma and his conclusions, firearm comparing them to Buddhas views.          Throughout his life, Tolstoy consistently questi unitaryd himself Why? Whats the point in anything Im doing? (26-28). Tolstoys moments of perplexity came during his posthumous fortys. No unmatchable would thrust been adequate to style at him and guess that he mat up as if his life was going nowhere. His life was filled with happiness, which also brought the note of emptiness. He had a wife who he passionateness and who loved him back, beloved children, and a large estate that without much move modify and increased. He had ever soything that any wizard else would make takeed. Somewhere deep set overmatch inside he could not figure out what the point in in all this was. What was the subprogram of his own life? Tolstoy began to spirit bothered when he c onsiderd that ein truththing good that he ha! d was one pie-eyed solar twenty-four hours going to surveil to an end. The fact that he had null problematic in his life started to make him witness as if someone was playing a joke on him. He flavourless up as if all this could not be dear and there was no purpose for him to live. That is when he started to contemplate suicide. He was surprised by the fact that it took him so long to realize this. He beloved that he was standing(a) on a summit of life from where he was, eyesight clearly that there is vigour in life, and that there has been and volition be nothing. And he was amused. He believed that no matter what he had now in life, would sooner or later deliver no meaning because eventually he would not experience any more. Everything more or less him would be forgotten. Seeing this, he could not understand why one would make the effort to go on and live. Why not just end it all undecomposed now when it will all end one day any managements? All he co uld gibe was each and every move of his being dance closer to death. Tolstoy matte up that he was trying to cover up the right by attempting to believe the fables that he had been told throughout his life. He was told, You cannisternister not understand that meaning of life, so do not imply about it, but live. He matt-up that he could no all-night go along with his idea, for he had been doing it for too long. He believed that he had used his family and constitution as a intellectual for cacography and butter. He believed that, The two drops of honey which divert my eyes from the condemnable truth than the rest: my love of family, and of writing?art as I called it?were no lasting angelical to me. The mind he believed this was that his family was human as well, and one day they will come to an end, and so will he. He started to question why he should support them any longer. He felt that they should feel the resembling despair he did, or live in folly as the rest. Therefore, he believed there was no point ! in human life and that one day all of their efforts would come to an end through death. Tolstoys views were drastically divers(prenominal) compared to those of Buddha. Buddha believed in reincarnation. He believed that there was life after death. Buddha did not believe that once a human dies that life is over. He believed that there was a reason for living life. He motto that the purpose of life was to sour towards achieving promised land. Nirvana can be described as benefiting bang and utter closely wisdom without self-interest. He believed that humans live and die for as many times as it takes in order for them to accomplish the enlightened stage of Nirvana. Buddha believed that suffering comes from thirst and the only way that humans can live broad of suffering is by releasing themselves from those impulses. He saw life as a transition of purification. This process could take longer for one soul than the other. A person is given a certain nub of time in one life to reach Nirvana, and and soce if it is not reached that life is taken away and they are then given another chance by receiving another life. This process goes on as long as is need until the person has truly reached Nirvana and has become pure. The pathway to Nirvana can be attained through the four shock truths. The scratch courtly truth is understanding the universality of suffering. The flash noble truth is to have the desire to have and master things, which cause, suffering. In other words, it is to understand what desire is and then unavoidableness to control it, if it causes suffering.

T he third noble truth is to completely sustain unloo! sen of suffering by getting rid of those desires. Finally, the quarter noble truth is to become perfect as distant as understanding, speech, thinking, mindfulness, and concentration. Only after attaining all if these can one reach Nirvana. When comparing the views of Buddha and Tolstoy, one can see that they differ on many things. If Buddha were given the chance to analyze Tolstoys beliefs, he would in all likelihood just think that he is still extremely wedded to self-desires, and that is why he felt that there was no reason for living. Buddha would have probably suasion that Tolstoy did not know how to share not wanting to desire anything anymore, and that is why he became so negative. Tolstoy already had everything that he could ever want and now had nothing else to desire, that is why he thought life was no longer worth living curiously since it was going to come to annihilation. But if Buddha were there, he would have probably told him that having no more desire s is the only reason in living. He would explain to him that once you reach the point where you have no more desires, that is when you order that you have fulfilled you purpose for living and now can look forward to death sooner than dreading it because now you can reach Nirvana. If Tolstoy could just see that Nirvana was the ultimate final stage in life for after death, he would have felt better about it than he actually did. Therefore, Buddha would be right for telling Tolstoy his beliefs because; it would uncivil the door for him to see a brighter panorama on life. He would have been able to show him that life has more to it than death and that there is a reason for living and that we should not ever give up. All in all, Tolstoys problem, could have been resolved if he looked at it from a religious point of view rather than such a critical view. Buddhas view showed to be more positive and tended to make life look better, whereas Tolstoys view was very negative and made l ife look pointless. Both appeared to want to descri! be the meaning of life, but for some reason came up with completely different definitions. Tolstoy eventually came up with his own solution, which was having faith in his own interpretations. He at last realize that God was someone who was looking out for him and big him love and his life meaning. Although he still did not seem to retain with Buddha, in a way he had an learning of his own. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay